Unconventional Shale-Gas Resource Systems and Processes
Affecting Gas Generation, Retention, Storage, and Flow Rates
Daniel M. Jarvie, Tim E. Ruble, Richard Drozd, Hossein Alimi, and Valentina Baum. Humble Geochemical Services, P.O. Box 789, Humble, TX 77347 [email protected]
Geochemical and petrophysical characterization of various
shale-gas systems in the U.S. indicates a variety of unconventional shale-gas
system types
(fig. 1). The most
basic distinction is gas type: biogenic and
thermogenic, although there can also be mixtures of the two gas
types
.
Thermogenic shale-gas systems are further segregated into various sub-
types
depending on geochemistry and geology. The shale-gas system categories are: 1)
high-thermal maturity shale; 2) low-thermal maturity shales; 3) mixed lithology
intra-formational systems containing shale, sands, and silts; 4)
inter-formational systems where gas is generated in a mature shale and stored
in a less mature shale; and 5) mixed systems. A key difference among these
shale-gas systems are initial gas-flow rates. High-thermal maturity systems
tend to have much higher gas-flow rates than low-maturity systems because of
gas charge and storage mechanisms. Certainly other non-geochemical factors,
such as shale mineralogy, are extremely important in being able to stimulate
these shales to flow gas.
Geochemical comparison of the
Antrim Shale (Michigan basin), New Albany Shale (Illinois basin), and Barnett
Shale (Fort Worth basin) are used to illustrate these different systems as well
as other systems.
These systems show significant
differences in gas type, organic richness, thermal maturity, and gas-flow
rates. Gas-flow rates are then
dependent upon the amount of gas stored (or generated) and the ability to
release gas from adsorption sites as well
as connecting to micro-reservoir
compartments (Barnett Shale only).
AAPG Search and Discover Article #90067©2007 AAPG Mid-Continent Section Meeting, Wichita, Kansas